Follow me on MEDIUM




This just in...

Tag Cloud

Powered by Squarespace
Selected Recent Publications

Unclear Lines: State and Non-State Actors in Abyei. In Vaughan, Chris; Schomerus, Mareike; and de Vries, Lotje (eds.) 2013. The Borderlands of South Sudan: Authority and Identity in Contemporary and Historical Perspectives. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Is a building a witness? Onsite Review 30: Ethics and PublicsAn essay on the decline of the figure of the witness, and the rise of forensics. Fall 2013.

Dreams are not made of Concrete. Fourth Genre. Volume 15, Issue 2. Fall 2013. A long essay on migration, money, and dreams, in Juba, South Sudan.

Dividing lines: Grazing and conflict along the Sudan-South Sudan border. (65,000 words). HSBA Working Paper No. 30. Geneva: Small Arms Survey. 18 July 2013.

Under the soil, the peopleOnsite Review 29: Geology. An essay on geology and the claims of memory. May 2013.

Influence: Three and a Half Metaphors. An essay on literary influence. The Waste Books. 20 April 2013.

Every thing has its own silence. An essay on sound and silence, in Marseille and Paris. Onsite Review 28: Sound. Fall 2012. You can read a version of this essay just prior to the final tearsheet here.

Islands of the Imagination. A short letter on islands. Onsite Review 28: Sound. Fall 2012. It is available here as a PDF. 

On the road to Yei. A reportage on rubbish in Juba, Southern Sudan. Anthropology News. 15 October. You can read it here

Death in Field. A short story about photography, compulsion, and gesture. Hotel Amerika. Fall Edition 2012. Volume 10. Number 2.

A sketch for the tent of the future. An essay on Qadhafi, nomadism, and the history of the Libyan state. Read it in Onsite Review 27: Rural Urbanism. 5 May 2012.

On hunting. A meandering exploration of exile, detectives, and, obviously, hunters. Originally published at The Waste Books. 13 January 2012. Then published as a letter in Onsite Review 27: Rural Urbanism. 5 May 2012.

just stay put and keep quiet. An essay on the form of the camp. Originally published at The Waste Books. 13 January 2012. Then published as a letter in Onsite Review 27: Rural Urbanism. 5 May 2012.

No lines, no peace? On the borders of Abyei. An essay on notions of territory in Abyei, Sudan. Anthropology News. 21 February 2012.

Moral Conquest: visiting the Wellcome Collection. On dirt and science. Onsite 26: Dirt. Fall Issue 2011.

Burning the future. On rubbish in Juba. Onsite 26: Dirt. Fall Issue 2011.

Self is a form. A selection of aphorisms. Hotel Amerika. Volume 10. Number. 1. Fall Edition 2011.

Breaking the cycle of violence in Sudan. Comment piece on clashes in Jonglei. Guardian. 3 September 2011.

Creating Facts on the Ground: Conflict Dynamics in Abyei. Small Arms Survey. Working paper available here in English, and here in Arabic. 7 July 2011.

Khartoum a bloqué les accords de paix à Abyei. Comment piece on the situation in Abyei. La Croix. 17 June 2011.

Animal Cities, on urban planning in Juba. Onsite 25: Identity. Spring Issue. The magazine is available here.

When the War Began. Short story about the outbreak of war. Annalemma Magazine. 13 April 2011.

Sudan’s proxy war. Guardian. 8 April 2011.

How we train our cops to fear Islam. Washington Monthly. (with Meg Stalcup). Original is here. 3 March 2011.

 A divided Sudan will test tribal tensions. Guardian. 7 January 2011.


« New Small Arms Survey Report on Abyei | Main | Creating Facts on the Ground: Conflict Dynamics in Abyei »

Guardian op-ed: Breaking the cycle of violence in Sudan

Breaking the cycle of violence in Sudan

Despite the stability promised by South Sudan's independence, deep tribal conflicts make peace in the region a distant prospect.

Guardian. Comment is Free. Saturday 3 September 2011. Original article here.

In July, movie stars and foreign dignitaries assembled in Juba to mark South Sudan's emergence as Africa's newest state after decades of civil war. Almost two months later, the conflict shows no signs of stopping, as north and south alternate between waging a low-key proxy war and conducting economic warfare. Hopes are running high among South Sudanese that their new government will be able to transform the country, but loyalty is to tribe before nation, and post-independence life has seen the intensification of a number of tribal conflicts.

On 18 August, at least 600 died in Uror county, Jonglei state, as Murle raiders attacked Lou Nuer villagers, in the latest in a series of raids and tit-for-tat attacks between the two groups that have left more than 1,000 dead since February. In grisly but illuminating symmetry, the UN said that around 26,000 cattle were stolen and 26,800 people displaced in the latest series of clashes.

It would be hard to overemphasise how central cattle are to both groups. Both Murle and Lou Nuer are transhumant peoples, seasonally migrating with their cattle. Cattle are more than just an economic resource, and a currency for marriage dowries – they are the language in which life is articulated. Perceptions of masculinity, in particular, are tied to cattle ownership, and cattle raiding has long been a traditional way of acquiring respect.

Though skirmishes over cattle have always been part of the rhythm of life, it would be wrong to see these clashes as somehow apolitical: the relic of a bygone age before the birth of the fledgling state. Raiding itself was transformed by the civil war.

Previously, regional codes forbade the burning of villages and the killing of women and children, but during the second civil war, both the rebel Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) – now in power in the south – and Khartoum backed tribal factions, arming them and creating a new style of warfare in which both women and children were targets.

The depths of the enmity between Murle and Lou Nuer doesn't stem from ancient conflicts, but from the war. During the long first civil war (1956-72), which began the same year as Sudan became independent, Khartoum armed Murle militias to fight against the Lou Nuer, who formed part of the Anyanya movement, South Sudan's first rebel force and a precursor to the SPLM.

Between 1983 and 2005, Sudan fought a second civil war, pitting the army of the SPLM – the SPLA – against the northern government. In this period, communities in the south could not rely on the government to defend them, and their relationship with the SPLM could also be difficult, so many of them formed self-defence forces.

The Murle leader, Sultan Ismael Konyi, created the Pibor Defence Forces, named after an area of Jonglei state, to protect Murle villages and cattle from the SPLA, which in that region was dominated by the Nuer. Khartoum exploited these divisions, funding some groups and making them turn against others. This is a process that Khartoum continues to this day.

While during the second civil war, Sultan Ismael Konyi accepted weapons from Khartoum, after the comprehensive peace agreement was signed in 2005, he joined the nascent SPLM-dominated government of South Sudan, and became a spokesman for peace and reconciliation.

The ease with which Konyi changed sides testifies to the primacy of tribal ties over national ones: his primary loyalty is to the Murle, who are his constituency. Tribal groups are exploited by state forces, to be sure, in order to further their own ends, but just as often tribal groups exploit the state structure when it is convenient for them.

The Lou Nuer also had a self-defence force during the war, the so-called "white army", which received arms from both Khartoum and the SPLA at different times. Since peace was declared in 2005, it has actually become more, not less, important. Sudan is a remote, rugged country, and the state is often not able to provide efficient protection for its citizens. In May 2007, for instance, the Dinka people of Duk county stole 20,000 cattle from the Lou Nuer, bolstering the sense among the Lou Nuer of a need for a self-defence force.

On 26 August, Salva Kiir Mayardit, the president of South Sudan, announced that he would be sending in the SPLA to break up the clashes between the Murle and the Lou Nuer.

One of the reasons local forces are relied upon is because they are embedded in local social structures: brothers and friends can be trusted. The SPLA, in contrast, is notoriously undisciplined – in April, following clashes between the army and rebels in Upper Nile state, Human Rights Watch said the army was responsible for a series of human rights abuses. Sending in the army is unlikely to address the core reasons for the emergence of self-defence groups.

UN calls for disarmament have met with little success. In 2006, the government of South Sudan tried to disarm the Lou Nuer self-defence groups, leading to heavy fighting and 1,600 deaths. When the dust settled, the "white army" was left largely intact.

In a country with an undisciplined army and heavily armed groups who threaten to steal cattle, one can understand why disarmament might not be an appealing prospect.

So what can be done? The answer is certainly not the deployment of UN peacekeepers, which was announced on 26 August; thus far, the UN has a less than enviable record in Sudan.

Instead, the best way to break the cycle of violence is, as it always has been, meetings between the leaders of the Lou Nuer and the Murle. On 27 August, the government of South Sudan announced that it would convene a conference of tribal leaders nationwide, to search for mechanisms to address the problem of tribal conflicts. New mechanisms may mean returning to some of the codes that existed before the war; codes that don't prevent raiding, but regulate it.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>